What Is the Smartest Way to Power the AI Boom? - Gizmodo
What Is the Smartest Way to Power the AI Boom? Gizmodo
One board for past buildouts, current load, future requests, power-capacity gaps, and the primary → secondary → tertiary dependencies that turn a greenfield site into an operating compute campus. Every number links to a primary source.
Every headline datapoint is a card. Click any card to jump to the underlying detail.
Worldwide facility layer assembled from open sources plus the full ATLAS directory (unrestricted use granted to Data Center Watch by the ATLAS IP team, 2026-07), OpenStreetMap (ODbL), PeeringDB interconnection campuses, FracTracker US operating/proposed inventory, and Epoch AI large AI campuses (CC BY 4.0). ATLAS coordinates are city-level centroids (labelled as such), not rooftop GPS. DataCenterMap and Baxtel remain catalogued only (commercial no-scrape). MW and H100-eq appear only when a source states them. Gaps stay empty. The globe plots every geocoded row; fiber arcs remain illustrative corridors.
Facility count by country label · incomplete where source omits country
Provenance mix · dual-count possible pre-dedup across sources
| Facility | Operator | Country | City / region | MW | H100-eq | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Jade | Crusoe | United States | Cheyenne | 10.0 GW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| SoftBank Data Center/PORTS Technology Campus | Softbank/Open AI (unconfirmed) | United States | Piketon | 9,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stratos Project, eastern parcels | — | United States | Snowville | 9,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| New Era Energy & Digital Data Center | — | United States | Lea County | 7,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| GW Ranch (Pacifico Energy) | — | United States | Pecos County | 5,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Homer City Energy Campus | Homer City Redevelopment (with Kiewit as contractor/partner) | United States | Homer City | 4,500 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Shippingport Bruce Mansfield Data Center/Project Phoenix | Aligned Data Centers | United States | Shippingport | 3,600 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Pittsylvania County Data Center | Balico LLC | United States | Chatham | 3,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| MSB Global Services Matrix Data Center | — | United States | Sulphur Springs | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stak Energy Data Center | Stak | United States | North Slope Borough | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Vermaland Data Center | Vermaland LLC | United States | Red Rock | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Hobart Data Center | Amazon | United States | Hobart | 2,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Technology Campus | VALCO HANOVER COUNTY | United States | Ashland | 2,400 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Adams Fork Harless Data Center | TransGas Development, LLC | United States | Holden | 2,398 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Adams Fork Wharncliffe Data Center | TransGas Development, LLC | United States | Wharncliffe | 2,398 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| New Carlisle Data Center | Amazon | United States | New Carlisle | 2,200 MW | — | operating | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Eneus Energy | Eneus Energy | United States | Harlingen | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Green Data Center | — | United States | Socorro | 2,000 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerBridge/LandBridge | — | United States | Between Odessa and Pecos | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Horizon | Poolside/CoreWeave | United States | Fort Stockton | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sterling Data Center | Granite Renewables | United States | Sterling | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sweetwater 1 and 2 | IREN | United States | Sweetwater | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Bunkhouse | Gaines Family Land LLC | United States | Cartersville | 1,830 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| AREP PowerHouse Grand Prairie | PowerHouse Data Centers | United States | Midlothian | 1,800 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerHouse Data Centers | — | United States | Jackson Twp/ Joliet | 1,800 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerHouse Hillwood Holding | PowerHouse Hillwood Holding | United States | Joliet | 1,800 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Ridgeline Microgrid | Fundamental Data LLC | United States | Davis | 1,656 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Data Center | — | United States | Silver Springs | 1,600 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Antelope Data Center | — | United States | Cedar City | 1,500 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Arizona Land Consulting Co. | — | United States | Tonopah | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Blakely Data Center | — | United States | Blakely | 1,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Crusoe/ Blue Energy Data Center | Crusoe | United States | Victoria | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| NE Edge Groton Data Center | — | United States | Waterford | 1,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Open AI/ SoftBank "Freebird" | — | United States | Burlington | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Gold Data Center | — | United States | Clifton Twship | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stargate Data Center | Bristolville 25 Developer LLC | United States | Warren | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Frontier Vantage Data Center | — | United States | Abilene | 1,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Related Digital/The Barn | Related Digital/Open AI/Oracle | United States | Saline | 1,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| xAI Colossus 2 | xAI | United States | Memphis | 1,400 MW | — | expanding | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Arrowhead | — | United States | Ocilla | 1,250 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Wyoming Hyperscale Whitebox | Prometheus Hyperscale | United States | Evanston | 1,250 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Zenith Volts Data Center | — | United States | Roswell | 1,240 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Aquilla: Abbott Holding Data Center | RCM Hill | United States | Hill County | 1,235 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Data Center | Amazon | United States | Heppner | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| CloudBurst Data Center | — | United States | New Braunfels | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC Data Center | Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC | United States | Cave City | 1,200 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Oasis Data Center | — | United States | Fredericksburg | 1,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Open AI/ SoftBank Stargate Data Center (Lancium Clean Campus) | Microsoft (previously Open AI/Oracle) | United States | Abilene | 1,200 MW | — | operating | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Marvel | Logistic Land Investments LLC | United States | Bessemer | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Spade | Related Digital/Google | United States | New Florence | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| South Valley Technology Park Data Center | Tract | United States | Sparks | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Starwood Digital Ventures | — | United States | New Castle | 1,200 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Data Center | Fleet | United States | Silver Springs | 1,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Jeffersonville Data Center | Amazon | United States | Jeffersonville | 1,184 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| EdgeCore | EdgeCore | United States | Kents Store | 1,100 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stack Data Center | — | United States | Stafford | 1,100 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Goodnight Campus | Crusoe | United States | Claude | 1,030 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Wilsonville Data Center | Northpoint Development | United States | Wilsonville | 1,008 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Ridgeland | Amazon | United States | Ridgeland | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Eagle Rock Data Center | Eagle Rock | United States | Palmer | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Flint Hills Digital Campus | — | United States | Emporia | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Lacy Lakeview Data Center | InfraKey Capital | United States | Lacy Lakeview | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Lower Peninsula Data Center | — | United States | Lower Peninsula | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Meta Project Seafox | Wurldwide LLC/ Meta | United States | El Paso | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Nixxy-Tachyon 9 Data Center | — | United States | Epping | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Panattoni Project Cannoli | United States | Van Buren Township | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da | |
| Project Domino | Meta | United States | Lebanon | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Quantica LLC Big Sky Campus | Meta, Google, Amazon | United States | Broadview | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Rocklocker LLC | — | United States | Kalkaska Township | 1,000 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sentinel Grove Technology Park/ Project Jarvis | — | United States | Fort Pierce | 1,000 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stafford Technology Campus | — | United States | Stafford | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Morris Data Center | Tract Data Centers | United States | Morris | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Treetop Development Project | onovan Drive Holdings LLC | United States | Hopewell Junction | 1,000 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Walterboro Data Center | Eagle Rock Partners | United States | Walterboro | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Salem Township Amazon Data Center | Amazon | United States | Wapwallopen | 960 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Colossus 2 | SpaceXAI | United States | — | 946 MW | 1,390k | ai_campus | Epoch AI Data Centers (CC BY 4.0 |
| Project Sail | Atlas Development | United States | Newnan | 936 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle | Amazon | United States | — | 910 MW | 687k | ai_campus | Epoch AI Data Centers (CC BY 4.0 |
| Robena Mine Data Center/ Project Hummingbird | Essential Utilities/ International Electric Power of Pittsburgh | United States | Monongahela Township | 910 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Bolingbroke Technology Campus | — | United States | Macon | 900 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
Coverage model: what we already observe, what should be ingested next, and where a power story becomes a land, water, equipment, labor, capital, or community story. Green dots are tracked; violet dots are catalogued for ingestion.
site control · zoning · water rights
MW request · ramp · utilization
queue · study · milestone
service date · tariff · curtailment
gas · nuclear · renewables · BESS
transformers · lines · upgrades
PUE · WUE · source · discharge
backhaul · latency · route diversity
air · noise · tax · local votes
GPU · switchgear · generators
design · crews · commissioning
capex · incentives · revenue
uptime · emissions · waste heat
The ticker is fed by an automated RSS crawl across grid, energy, data-center, HPC, and large-load sources. Headlines link to the original publisher; Data Center Watch does not copy article bodies.
What Is the Smartest Way to Power the AI Boom? Gizmodo
As gas plants rise to power AI, renewable energy allies are fighting for cleaner alternatives WKMG
Power-Grid Stocks Surge on AI Data Center Demand; Gaon Cable Jumps 9.46%, Taihan Cable Gains 8.81% bloomingbit
Core Scientific (CORZ) Recent Rally Puts Its AI Data Center Valuation Narrative To The Test Yahoo Finance
Constellation Energy (CEG) And The AI Power Narrative As Valuation Questions Build simplywall.st
Colorado city eyes new data center rules as AI boom raises water, power, and noise fears Yahoo
Meta Alberta Data Center: AI Infrastructure Boom 2026 quasa.io
AI Infrastructure Stocks For Data Center Growth After Apple OpenAI Fallout simplywall.st
Is Caterpillar (CAT) Expensive Following AI Data Center Hype And Mining Deals? simplywall.st
A typical AI-focused data centre consumes as much electricity as 100,000 homes; that demand has helped trigger a race to put computing clusters into orbit, where companies argue that near-continuous sunlight could eliminate the utility bill — though the solar …
AI Data Center Power Consumption Surges: Solid-State Transformers Become Inevitable as Sungrow Enters 800V DC Architecture Pandaily
Birmingham’s humane society sues city, AI company over data center plans AL.com
Actual system demand — not interconnection requests. Crosshair cursors, ±1σ band, mean reference, scientific axes. Gaps stay empty — nothing is interpolated.
μ / σ / range from observed hours only · brush + scroll to zoom · EIA-930
Daily peak by balancing authority · fixed categorical colors · nulls not filled
Step series · queue jumps only at published decks · no interpolation between months
Approved vs observed · realization % = observed ÷ approved when both exist
| Region | Total queue | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ERCOT | 438.0 GW | 2026-03-31 |
Nameplate capacity by fuel — what is built, not what is requested. Complements the queue charts above.
Nightingale rose · nameplate MW share · EIA-860/860M
Lollipop fleet map · operating nameplate by region
| Region | MW | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ERCOT | 174.9 GW | 2026-04 |
| ERCOT fuel | MW | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas | 67.2 GW | 38% |
| Wind | 40.0 GW | 23% |
| Solar | 31.6 GW | 18% |
| Battery Storage | 15.9 GW | 9% |
| Coal | 13.4 GW | 8% |
| Nuclear | 5,139 MW | 3% |
| Oil/Diesel | 798 MW | 0% |
| Hydro | 549 MW | 0% |
| Other/Biomass | 374 MW | 0% |
Lower is better · reference line at industry ~1.5 PUE · source-linked table below
| Entity | $/W | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1x1 combined-cycle gas turbine plant (generation side, not the data center building) | $0.92/W | 2023 | GridLab / Energy Futures Group / Halcyon, citing EIA (Sargent & Lundy cost study) |
| Traditional prime markets, full build (shell + M&E + cooling + fit-out) | $11.00/W | 2025-2026 | CBRE Investment Management, citing Turner & Townsend Data Center Cost Index |
| Global average (shell-and-core construction) | $11.30/W | 2026 (forecast) | JLL |
| Entity | PUE | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google (global fleet-wide) | 1.09 | 2025 | Google (datacenters.google) |
| AWS (global fleet-wide) | 1.14 | 2025 | Amazon.com Inc. (Amazon Sustainability) |
| US national average (all data center types) | 1.40 | 2023 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report (LBNL-2001637) |
| Global industry average (Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2025, n=681) | 1.54 | 2025 | Uptime Institute (Uptime Intelligence) |
| Entity | Share | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States — all data centers (649 TWh reference case) | 11.8% of total U.S. electricity use | 2030 (reference forecast) | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — United States Data Center Energy Usage Report: 2025 Update |
| Ireland — all grid-connected data centers (7.663 TWh metered) | 23.0% of total metered electricity consumption | 2025 | Central Statistics Office Ireland — Data Centres Metered Electricity Consumption 2025 |
| United States — all data centers (176 TWh estimated consumption) | 4.4% of total U.S. electricity use | 2023 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report |
| Metric | Entity | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contracted large-load capacity | Ireland — data centers + other new-technology loads, transmission contracts | 2,000 MW | 2025-08 | EirGrid / SONI — Large Demand Facility Fault Ride Through information paper |
| Data-center capacity | New Zealand — data-center capacity (median scenario) | 400 MW | 2035 (forecast) | Transpower — Te Kanapu Data Centres Insights |
| Data-center energy share | Ireland — data centers + new-technology loads (median scenario) | 30.0% of electrical energy requirements | 2032 (forecast) | EirGrid / SONI — Large Demand Facility Fault Ride Through information paper |
| Projected data-center load growth | PJM — projected data-center load growth (up to) | 30.0 GW | 2030 (forecast) | PJM — 2025 Year in Review: Planning |
| Observed data-center peak demand | Ireland — data centers (observed peak demand to date) | 800 MW | 2025-08 | EirGrid / SONI — Large Demand Facility Fault Ride Through information paper |
Interconnecting TSPs must submit the Batch Zero LIF workbook, Dynamic Stability Study Form, and Section 9.2.1.2/9.2.1.4 attestations to BatchZero@ercot.com source
ILLEs must submit Form X (WLPUN designation), Form W (PCLR commitment), and Section 9.2.1.1 attestations to their interconnecting DSP/TSP source
PUCT approved rules for ERCOT to review an initial batch of large-load interconnection requests (75+ MW), including a $50,000/MW fee structure source
ERCOT tracking 438 GW of large-load requests; ~90% from data centers; 198 GW applied in Q1 2026 alone source
ERCOT reported receiving 137 new LLI submissions totaling approximately 140,000 MW of new large load by 2036, still being processed source
226 GW of large-load interconnection requests, up from 63 GW twelve months earlier; 73% from data centers source
| Month | Total queue | Approved | Observed peak | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 438.0 GW | 9,042 MW | 3,883 MW | Utility Dive / PUCT; ERCOT Mar 2026 TAC report |
| 2025-11-30 | 226.0 GW | — | — | ERCOT public data via davefriedman.substack.com |
| 2025-03-31 | — | 9,042 MW | 3,883 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Mar 2026 (TAC) |
| 2024-11-30 | 63.0 GW | — | — | ERCOT public data via davefriedman.substack.com |
| 2024-01-31 | 39.3 GW | 4,479 MW | 2,587 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-12-31 | 39.2 GW | 4,479 MW | 2,432 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-10-31 | 39.3 GW | 3,926 MW | 2,379 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-09-30 | 39.6 GW | 3,926 MW | 2,379 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-08-31 | 42.5 GW | 3,744 MW | 2,347 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-07-31 | — | 3,084 MW | 2,336 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-05-31 | 41.8 GW | 2,620 MW | 2,072 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-04-30 | 39.6 GW | 2,570 MW | 2,013 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-03-31 | 39.4 GW | 2,570 MW | — | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2022-04-30 | 17.4 GW | — | — | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
Dual axis · log efficiency (Gflops/W) + HPL power (MW) · measured as published, never estimated
| List | System | Country | HPL Rmax | Power | Gflops/W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11 | El Capitan | United States | 1,742.0 PF | 29.6 MW | 58.89 |
| 2024-06 | Aurora | United States | 1,012.0 PF | 38.7 MW | 26.15 |
| 2022-06 | Frontier | United States | 1,102.0 PF | 21.1 MW | 52.23 |
| 2020-11 | Fugaku | Japan | 442.0 PF | 29.9 MW | 14.78 |
| 2019-06 | Summit | United States | 148.6 PF | 10.1 MW | 14.72 |
| 2016-06 | Sunway TaihuLight | China | 93.0 PF | 15.4 MW | 6.05 |
| 2013-06 | Tianhe-2 | China | 33.9 PF | 17.8 MW | 1.90 |
| 2012-11 | Titan | United States | 17.6 PF | 8.2 MW | 2.14 |
| 2011-11 | K computer | Japan | 10.5 PF | 12.7 MW | 0.83 |
| 2009-11 | Jaguar | United States | 1.8 PF | 7.0 MW | 0.25 |
| 2008-06 | Roadrunner | United States | 1.0 PF | 2.3 MW | 0.44 |
Documented data centers, computing payloads, and proposals in non-standard environments — including Antarctic research IT (McMurdo IT&C, IceCube, South Pole Telescope). Communications platforms and edge systems are labelled when they are not full data centers; no unpublished MW is inferred. Commercial hyperscale does not operate on the Antarctic continent under the Treaty System.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Commercial cloud device operationalized aboard the ISS in 2022; commercial AI inference conducted in orbit. Edge device, not a full data center.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Data Center Unit-1 powered by Red Hat Device Edge; cloud computing, AI/ML, data fusion, and space-cybersecurity test applications.
Axiom Space · Free-flying low Earth orbit nodes
First two dedicated orbital data-center nodes launched January 11, 2026; 2.5 Gbps-capable optical intersatellite links.
NASA + Hewlett Packard Enterprise · International Space Station
HPE ProLiant DL360 server plus Edgeline 4000 server; research and commercial edge-compute validation.
Starcloud · Low Earth orbit
First NVIDIA H100 GPU in orbit; company reports Gemini inference and nanoGPT training in space.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Planned additional ISS ODC node; Axiom says it plans at least three interconnected ODC nodes by 2027.
Starcloud · Sun-synchronous orbit
GPU cluster; persistent storage; 24/7 access; proprietary thermal and power systems in a smallsat form factor.
European Space Agency · ESA Discovery and Preparation study
Generic space-data-centre architecture and simulation; the work examines technical operational and economic constraints before mission approval.
Lonestar Data Holdings · Odysseus landing site near the lunar south pole
Commercial lunar data-storage and edge-processing test; data was stored on the Moon and returned to Earth.
Highlander / HiCloud · Lingshui Li, Hainan, China
Builder-backed project reported as running smoothly after its first module launched March 31, 2023; commercial undersea data-center service and deployment program.
Microsoft · European Marine Energy Centre, North Sea
240 kW; 12 racks; 864 servers; 27.6 PB; deployed June 2018 and retrieved July 2020.
Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries + 12-org consortium (KIOST, UNIST, POSCO, GS E&C, SK Telecom) · Offshore Ulsan, South Korea
Site selected April 2026; test module at 20 m depth (as reported); target PUE 1.2; 51.1 billion won total investment through 2030; demonstration facility targeted by 2030, commercial construction from 2031. Nothing deployed yet.
Highlander / CCCC · China coastal regions
Strategic partnership signed June 2026 for scaled undersea compute deployment and computing-power / offshore-energy synergy.
Subsea Cloud · Subsea deployment portfolio
Modular subsea data centers on a build/deploy/maintain model; company marketing claims up to 700 MW per-site capability (a capability claim, not deployed capacity); Project OTTO rolling customer trial began October 2024 off south-west Norway with a 16-rack unit at 150 kW+ per rack.
Microsoft · Pacific Ocean seabed
First underwater data-center pilot operated approximately one kilometer off the Pacific coast from August to November 2015.
NetworkOcean · San Francisco Bay, California, USA
Company claimed a 500 kW capsule and offered 2,048 NVIDIA H100 GPUs for reservation; sought no permits and SF Bay regulators warned of heavy fines (Wired, Sept 2024). No public evidence the test ever took place; current status unknown.
Denv-R / Geps Techno · Quai Wilson, Loire River, Nantes, France
200 kW in a 100 m2 solar-covered container housing four racks; passive Loire river-water cooling without pumps; operational since October 2024. A swell-powered offshore version is planned, not built.
Nautilus Data Technologies · Stockton, California, USA
6.5 MW critical IT load across four data halls; Tier III; ~55 kW rack densities via river-water cooling; commissioned 2021. Listed for sale at $45m in November 2024 at 86% leased as the operator pivots to licensing its EcoCore cooling technology.
Aker BP / Armada · Norwegian Continental Shelf, Norway
Agreement announced March 2026; begins with a single containerized Galleon unit for on-rig processing of drilling and operational data. Edge compute on a working platform, not a colocation data center; no capacity figures published.
Keppel Data Centres · 25 Loyang Crescent, Singapore
25 MW project with a four-story 19.2 MW waterborne module; seawater-cooled; capacity committed to an unnamed global hyperscaler; funded by Keppel Data Centre Fund II. Construction began Q1 2026; go-live targeted 2028.
Samsung Heavy Industries · No site announced
Concept/pre-order stage targeting commercialization as soon as Q2 2028; dedicated barge with on-board electrical infrastructure, initially shore-grid powered with water cooling. No vessel built, no committed capacity.
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines / Hitachi / Hitachi Systems · Japan (Malaysia and US under consideration)
MOU signed March 30, 2026 for demand verification and feasibility studies; operations targeted 2027 or later. Illustrative example: a car carrier offers ~54,000 m2 floor area; ~1-year conversion vs several years for a land build. No vessel converted yet.
Arctic World Archive (Piql / SNSK) · Mine no. 3, Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway
Offline, air-gapped piqlFilm vault 300 m inside the mine at about -4C; launched March 2017; hosts the GitHub Arctic Code Vault. Archival storage with manual retrieval, not an online data center - zero compute, off-grid by design.
Bluebird Network · Springfield, Missouri, USA
6 MW built-out capacity (per Data Center Map listing); 85 feet underground encased in solid limestone; three diverse utility feeds, three backup generators, SOC 2 Type II; colocation plus fiber transport and Internet services.
Tencent · Gui'an New Area, Guizhou, China
Capacity for 300,000 servers with about one-sixth housed in five tunnel caves; more than 30,000 m2 of tunneled space on a ~470,000 m2 site; maximum PUE ~1.1 logged in a Ministry of Industry and Information Technology inspection.
GPI · Val di Non, Italy
European data center built inside an active mine approximately 100 meters below the surface; officially online in June 2026.
Lefdal Mine Data Centers · Måløy, Norway
Six underground levels and 75 chambers; up to 120,000 m2 potential white space; Level 3 capacity is 80 MW.
Bahnhof · Stockholm, Sweden
Operating data center built inside a Cold War civil-defense / nuclear fallout shelter beneath Vita Bergen.
Green Mountain · Stavanger, Norway
Former high-security NATO ammunition storage converted to a Tier III mountain-hall data center; 25 MW site capacity and 22,600 m2 space.
MOUNT10 · Swiss Alps, Switzerland
Underground data-storage and data-center site in former Swiss military bunkers.
Iron Mountain · Butler County, Pennsylvania
220 feet underground; 15.5 MW power capacity; 330,000 square feet; geothermal cooling from an underground reservoir.
Westland Bunker · Montgomery County, Texas, USA
Built 1982 as Westland Oil headquarters with a 40,000 sq ft nuclear bomb shelter; expanded with a 107,000 sq ft data center; 23 MW power capacity (per Baxtel); zero-downtime performance through Hurricane Ike.
Deltalis · Near Attinghausen, Swiss Alps, Switzerland
Up to 10,000 m2 planned colocation space in a Cold War command-and-control bunker; Deltalis exited retail colocation in 2018 and the site was reportedly repositioned toward cryptocurrency mining/storage.
SoftBank / HAPSMobile · Stratosphere at approximately 19 km
62,500-foot / 19-km test flight; first LTE connectivity from a fixed-wing HAPS. Communications platform, not a data center.
AALTO / Airbus · Stratosphere above 60,000 feet
Solar-electric stratospheric aircraft with observation and connectivity payloads. Airborne platform, not a data center.
SoftBank / Sceye · Stratosphere at approximately 20 km
Long-duration helium HAPS; pre-commercial service scheduled in Japan for 2026. Communications platform, not a data center.
Academic proposal · High-altitude platform
Research proposal for a flying data-center-enabled HAP; no commercial deployment identified.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (A. A. Periola) · Conceptual; modeled at 16-30 km altitude
Peer-reviewed MATLAB simulation of stratosphere-based data centres: modeled 43.9% average PUE improvement from an intelligent server-awakening architecture. No hardware built, flown, or deployed.
Project-level demand queues are still rare. Each card states whether it is a queue, capacity map, forecast, or controlled-access registry so the evidence is not overstated.
Research proposal for a flying data-center-enabled high-altitude platform, including energy, solar, thermal, communication, and offloading analysis. It is a study, not a deployment record.
Primary HAPS source covering Sunglider testing at 19 km, Sceye long-duration platform, solar power, payloads, and planned pre-commercial communications service. HAPS is tracked as atmospheric edge infrastructure, not a full data center.
Primary platform source for the solar-electric Zephyr HAPS operating above 60,000 feet with earth-observation and connectivity payloads. It is tracked as an airborne compute-adjacent platform, not a data center.
National capacity map for large users: available transport capacity, congestion, queue counts, and requested MW by supply area. It is a constraint and connection-readiness source, not a data-center project list.
Maps signed connection projects and high-/low-voltage sites with contracted capacity. It can inform location and queue diligence for large loads, but it does not publish a data-center-specific queue and access requires registration.
Official data-center connection policy, application form, technical assessment, constrained-area criteria, demand fees, maximum-import-capacity process, and energisation prerequisites. Individual applications are not published as a public queue.
System-planner data-center capacity scenarios and connection diligence. The companion connection-reporting process records proponent, site, coordinates, capacity, projected demand, commissioning date, and project stage; detailed portal access is controlled.
Primary demand-and-supply planning and firm-generation procurement signal. EMA identifies data centers and semiconductors as high-demand drivers; it does not identify individual data-center projects.
Current long-term forecast report, tables, data workbook, data-center accuracy report, and load-adjustment evidence. PJM vets large-load requests for commitments and double-counting; this is a forecast and validation source rather than a public queue.
Official system-planning entry point for data-center demand integration, connection processes, forecast development, and the 2026 ISP modelling/data workbooks. It is a planning source, not a public project queue.
Time-coincident load, wind, and solar generation profiles. ERCOT actuals cover 2017-2018; NYISO/MISO/SPP actuals cover 2018-2019. Includes deterministic and probabilistic forecasts for existing sites and projected capacity-growth scenarios derived from interconnection-queue proposals.
Operator requirements and planning context for non-conforming large loads, including data centers and advanced manufacturing. Useful for operational-readiness signals; it is not a public, project-level queue.
Transmission-system connection data published from Statnett’s connection database: reserved capacity and mature queue projects by company, industry category, MW volume, location, and planned completion. Category filtering can surface data-center / industrial demand where disclosed.
Project-scale large-load request workflow, study and fee milestones, energisation path, status materials, and committee records. This is the current deepest public data-center / large-load queue in the registry.
Primary system-operator paper with operating data-center peak demand, contracted capacity, demand share, connection applications, technical constraints, and 2032 adequacy scenarios. Some figures combine data centers with other new-technology loads and are labelled that way in Grid Watch.
Vendor and deployment source for underwater intelligent computing cabins, private cloud, undersea data centers, deployment projects, and the 2026 marine computing-power / offshore-energy partnership.
Primary mission record for the two underwater prototypes: deployment, retrieval, power, rack/server payload, storage, reliability, water use, and the current research-stage status.
Commercial subsea data-center platform describing modular build, deployment, maintenance, cooling, connectivity, and public performance claims. No public MW or operating customer count is assumed.
Generator-level inventory: nameplate capacity, fuel type, owner/utility, in-service and planned/actual retirement dates, prime mover, technology, and environmental equipment. Texas/ERCOT plants are a filterable state subset, not a separate file.
Primary orbital data-center program record covering AxDCU-1, the first two free-flying ODC nodes launched January 11, 2026, optical links, the ISS node roadmap, and long-term kilowatt-to-megawatt expansion intent.
North American reliability assessment with planner-submitted demand forecasts, large-load / data-center growth, resource-adequacy risk, and regional exposure. The source is a validated planning outlook, not an interconnection queue.
Company announcement for an operating data center approximately 100 meters below the surface inside an active mine in Val di Non.
Operating high-security data center in converted mountain halls / former NATO ammunition storage, with published site capacity, space, PUE, grid supplies, and build-out description.
Operating underground data-center campus in a former mine with published chambers, white-space potential, levels, power backbone, and 80 MW Level 3 capacity.
Operating Stockholm data center built inside a former Cold War civil-defense / nuclear fallout shelter, with published security, connectivity, cooling, and operations detail.
Operating secure underground data-storage / data-center infrastructure in former Swiss military bunkers in the Alps.
Operating colocation site 220 feet underground in a former limestone mine, with published 15.5 MW power capacity, 330,000 square feet, geothermal cooling, utility, and connectivity.
Critical-facilities, MEP, commissioning, and operations roles from public Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby boards — plus optional sponsored listings when Adzuna keys are configured. No Indeed or LinkedIn scraping.
Project-level LLI tracking, county permits, CSV/API export, docket alerts.
Open pro database Free while in beta