How NASA’s Artemis Lessons Apply to AI Infrastructure Planning - Data Center Knowledge
How NASA’s Artemis Lessons Apply to AI Infrastructure Planning Data Center Knowledge
Publisher pages open in a focused popup so you keep Data Center Watch context. We never copy article bodies — only the headline link.
Track facilities, current load, future requests, power-capacity gaps, component BOMs, buying intent, producer constraints, and the primary → secondary → tertiary dependencies that turn a greenfield site into an operating compute campus. Every number links to evidence.
Every headline datapoint is a card. Click any card to jump to the underlying detail.
Worldwide facility layer assembled from open sources plus the full ATLAS directory (unrestricted use granted to Data Center Watch by the ATLAS IP team, 2026-07), OpenStreetMap (ODbL), PeeringDB interconnection campuses, FracTracker US operating/proposed inventory, and Epoch AI large AI campuses (CC BY 4.0). ATLAS coordinates are city-level centroids (labelled as such), not rooftop GPS. DataCenterMap and Baxtel remain catalogued only (commercial no-scrape). MW and H100-eq appear only when a source states them. Gaps stay empty. The globe plots every geocoded row; fiber arcs remain illustrative corridors.
Facility count by country label · incomplete where source omits country
Provenance mix · dual-count possible pre-dedup across sources
| Facility | Operator | Country | City / region | MW | H100-eq | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Jade | Crusoe | United States | Cheyenne | 10.0 GW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| SoftBank Data Center/PORTS Technology Campus | Softbank/Open AI (unconfirmed) | United States | Piketon | 9,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stratos Project, eastern parcels | — | United States | Snowville | 9,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| New Era Energy & Digital Data Center | — | United States | Lea County | 7,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| GW Ranch (Pacifico Energy) | — | United States | Pecos County | 5,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Homer City Energy Campus | Homer City Redevelopment (with Kiewit as contractor/partner) | United States | Homer City | 4,500 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Shippingport Bruce Mansfield Data Center/Project Phoenix | Aligned Data Centers | United States | Shippingport | 3,600 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Pittsylvania County Data Center | Balico LLC | United States | Chatham | 3,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| MSB Global Services Matrix Data Center | — | United States | Sulphur Springs | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stak Energy Data Center | Stak | United States | North Slope Borough | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Vermaland Data Center | Vermaland LLC | United States | Red Rock | 3,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Hobart Data Center | Amazon | United States | Hobart | 2,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Technology Campus | VALCO HANOVER COUNTY | United States | Ashland | 2,400 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Adams Fork Harless Data Center | TransGas Development, LLC | United States | Holden | 2,398 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Adams Fork Wharncliffe Data Center | TransGas Development, LLC | United States | Wharncliffe | 2,398 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| New Carlisle Data Center | Amazon | United States | New Carlisle | 2,200 MW | — | operating | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Eneus Energy | Eneus Energy | United States | Harlingen | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Green Data Center | — | United States | Socorro | 2,000 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerBridge/LandBridge | — | United States | Between Odessa and Pecos | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Horizon | Poolside/CoreWeave | United States | Fort Stockton | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sterling Data Center | Granite Renewables | United States | Sterling | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sweetwater 1 and 2 | IREN | United States | Sweetwater | 2,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Bunkhouse | Gaines Family Land LLC | United States | Cartersville | 1,830 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| AREP PowerHouse Grand Prairie | PowerHouse Data Centers | United States | Midlothian | 1,800 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerHouse Data Centers | — | United States | Jackson Twp/ Joliet | 1,800 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| PowerHouse Hillwood Holding | PowerHouse Hillwood Holding | United States | Joliet | 1,800 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Ridgeline Microgrid | Fundamental Data LLC | United States | Davis | 1,656 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Data Center | — | United States | Silver Springs | 1,600 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Antelope Data Center | — | United States | Cedar City | 1,500 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Arizona Land Consulting Co. | — | United States | Tonopah | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Blakely Data Center | — | United States | Blakely | 1,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Crusoe/ Blue Energy Data Center | Crusoe | United States | Victoria | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| NE Edge Groton Data Center | — | United States | Waterford | 1,500 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Open AI/ SoftBank "Freebird" | — | United States | Burlington | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Gold Data Center | — | United States | Clifton Twship | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stargate Data Center | Bristolville 25 Developer LLC | United States | Warren | 1,500 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Frontier Vantage Data Center | — | United States | Abilene | 1,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Related Digital/The Barn | Related Digital/Open AI/Oracle | United States | Saline | 1,400 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| xAI Colossus 2 | xAI | United States | Memphis | 1,400 MW | — | expanding | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Arrowhead | — | United States | Ocilla | 1,250 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Wyoming Hyperscale Whitebox | Prometheus Hyperscale | United States | Evanston | 1,250 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Zenith Volts Data Center | — | United States | Roswell | 1,240 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Aquilla: Abbott Holding Data Center | RCM Hill | United States | Hill County | 1,235 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Data Center | Amazon | United States | Heppner | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| CloudBurst Data Center | — | United States | New Braunfels | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC Data Center | Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC | United States | Cave City | 1,200 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Oasis Data Center | — | United States | Fredericksburg | 1,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Open AI/ SoftBank Stargate Data Center (Lancium Clean Campus) | Microsoft (previously Open AI/Oracle) | United States | Abilene | 1,200 MW | — | operating | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Marvel | Logistic Land Investments LLC | United States | Bessemer | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Project Spade | Related Digital/Google | United States | New Florence | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| South Valley Technology Park Data Center | Tract | United States | Sparks | 1,200 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Starwood Digital Ventures | — | United States | New Castle | 1,200 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Data Center | Fleet | United States | Silver Springs | 1,200 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Jeffersonville Data Center | Amazon | United States | Jeffersonville | 1,184 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| EdgeCore | EdgeCore | United States | Kents Store | 1,100 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stack Data Center | — | United States | Stafford | 1,100 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Goodnight Campus | Crusoe | United States | Claude | 1,030 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Wilsonville Data Center | Northpoint Development | United States | Wilsonville | 1,008 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Amazon Ridgeland | Amazon | United States | Ridgeland | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Eagle Rock Data Center | Eagle Rock | United States | Palmer | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Flint Hills Digital Campus | — | United States | Emporia | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Lacy Lakeview Data Center | InfraKey Capital | United States | Lacy Lakeview | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Lower Peninsula Data Center | — | United States | Lower Peninsula | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Meta Project Seafox | Wurldwide LLC/ Meta | United States | El Paso | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Nixxy-Tachyon 9 Data Center | — | United States | Epping | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Panattoni Project Cannoli | United States | Van Buren Township | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da | |
| Project Domino | Meta | United States | Lebanon | 1,000 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Quantica LLC Big Sky Campus | Meta, Google, Amazon | United States | Broadview | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Rocklocker LLC | — | United States | Kalkaska Township | 1,000 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Sentinel Grove Technology Park/ Project Jarvis | — | United States | Fort Pierce | 1,000 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Stafford Technology Campus | — | United States | Stafford | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Tract Morris Data Center | Tract Data Centers | United States | Morris | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Treetop Development Project | onovan Drive Holdings LLC | United States | Hopewell Junction | 1,000 MW | — | suspended | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Walterboro Data Center | Eagle Rock Partners | United States | Walterboro | 1,000 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Salem Township Amazon Data Center | Amazon | United States | Wapwallopen | 960 MW | — | proposed | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Colossus 2 | SpaceXAI | United States | — | 946 MW | 1,390k | ai_campus | Epoch AI Data Centers (CC BY 4.0 |
| Project Sail | Atlas Development | United States | Newnan | 936 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle | Amazon | United States | — | 910 MW | 687k | ai_campus | Epoch AI Data Centers (CC BY 4.0 |
| Robena Mine Data Center/ Project Hummingbird | Essential Utilities/ International Electric Power of Pittsburgh | United States | Monongahela Township | 910 MW | — | approved/permitted/under con | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
| Bolingbroke Technology Campus | — | United States | Macon | 900 MW | — | cancelled | FracTracker Alliance National Da |
Coverage model: what we already observe, what should be ingested next, and where a power story becomes a land, water, equipment, labor, capital, or community story. Green dots are tracked; violet dots are catalogued for ingestion.
site control · zoning · water rights
MW request · ramp · utilization
queue · study · milestone
service date · tariff · curtailment
gas · nuclear · renewables · BESS
transformers · lines · upgrades
PUE · WUE · source · discharge
backhaul · latency · route diversity
air · noise · tax · local votes
GPU · switchgear · generators
design · crews · commissioning
capex · incentives · revenue
uptime · emissions · waste heat
The ticker is fed by an automated RSS crawl across grid, energy, data-center, HPC, and large-load sources. Headlines link to the original publisher; Data Center Watch does not copy article bodies.
How NASA’s Artemis Lessons Apply to AI Infrastructure Planning Data Center Knowledge
White House to rally utilities, data centers for AI power cost pledge, sources say Arizona Digital Free Press
VOTER GUIDE | Kansas political candidates' stances on data center development KSHB 41 Kansas City
TSMC’s Capex Surge Signals AI Infrastructure Still Scaling Data Center Knowledge
Taxpayer group warns New York's AI data center moratorium could cost jobs and investment WJAC
Meta's data center plans could help solve its AI spending problems Yahoo Finance
Vicor and the AI Power Trend Reshaping Data Center Hardware Zacks Investment Research
How many data center projects have been proposed in Michigan? The total grows MLive.com
What data center developers need to know about FERC’s large load directives Utility Dive
Michigan AI Data Center Project Sparks Debate Over Farmland Protection Insurance Journal
“AI Factories” to Drive Mexico’s Next Data Center Evolution Mexico Business News
Can the AI Data Center Boom Become a Major Growth Driver for T1 Energy? Zacks Investment Research
NASA’s Artemis audit and recent ERCOT planning changes point to a new discipline for AI infrastructure: proving demand before billions of dollars are committed.
How South Korea became the memory backbone of the global AI infrastructure boom Fierce Network
Meta's Louisiana Data Center Is Making Rural America Part of the AI Race Memeburn
Top 3 Construction Stocks For The AI Data Center Buildout Benzinga
AI's power problem gets a software-focused response from Elektros Stock Titan
Elektros Highlights Energy Research on Reducing AI Data Center Energy Demand Yahoo Finance
TeraWulf’s $19B Anthropic Lease Puts Its Brownfield AI Strategy to the Test Data Center Frontier
Is Littelfuse’s (LFUS) AI Data Center Push Quietly Redefining Its Core Investment Narrative? simplywall.st
AAOI vs. MXL: Which AI Data Center Infrastructure Stock Has an Edge? Zacks Investment Research
Can Super Micro Computer's RDHx Expansion Fuel AI Data Center Demand? The Globe and Mail
Signs MoU's for data center projects in Thailand and Indonesia
Diversified Energy Eyes AI Data Center Project in Letcher County WKLW 94.7 FM
Palm Beach County rejects huge AI data center near Trump's Mar-a-Lago after resident backlash Business Insider
AI’s Power Crunch Fuels a Pivot for These 2 Oilfield Stocks MarketBeat
AI data center backlash is aimed at the wrong target Washington Examiner
NVTS vs. VICR: Which AI Power Infrastructure Stock Has an Edge? TradingView
Former DXC president Howard Boville to lead company
Could Vertiv Be the Next Pick-and-Shovel Play for the AI Infrastructure Boom? The Motley Fool
Will begin prototype testing in Q3 2026
Miner Weekly: The Grid Pushback Against AI Has Begun TheEnergyMag
Will lead team commercializing microfluidics cooling solution
3M and Microsoft partner on AI data center optics and enterprise AI eeNews Europe
AI data center construction faces nationwide pushback FOX 10 Phoenix
‘Absolutely out of line’: Boulder City erupts after surprise data center approval Las Vegas Review-Journal
PBC Commissioners Reject Project Tango AI Data Center The Boca Raton Tribune
Duos Edge AI secures $111M data center contract in Georgia Investing.com
Soluna Hires Microsoft Data Center Executive Ryan Carver to Lead AI Buildout TheEnergyMag
Nebius Group (NBIS) Is Down 7.8% After Launching Asset-Light AI Data Center Partnership Model simplywall.st
Duos Edge AI Announces Five-Year 10 MW Customer Agreement at Columbus, Georgia Data Center Campus Quiver Quantitative
AI Data Center Market Faces Its Biggest Challenge: Power, Not GPUs, Will Decide the Winners | DataM Intelligence markets.businessinsider.com
AI boom drives states to rethink data center water use Axios
Data center joint ventures reshaping digital infrastructure A&O Shearman
How data center financing rewrites the rulebook A&O Shearman
Data center sustainability strategies for AI growth A&O Shearman
AI and data center development in a complex geopolitical landscape A&O Shearman
When can a power company take your land for data center infrastructure? The Conversation
Can a power company take your land to support a data center? It depends The Conversation
Nebius Embarks on "Asset-Light" Data Center Model AI Business
3 Stocks Riding the AI Data Center Power Buildout in July AOL.com
NextEra-Dominion's $420B merger signals a new M&A cycle built on AI load growth MarketScale
3 Stocks Riding the AI Data Center Power Buildout in July 24/7 Wall St.
Project Flash, a 100MW data center, eyed for the county's Summit View Business Park
China influence fears grow as anti-AI data center protests spread nationwide Fox Business
Highreso to explore using PowerX's BESS, pair to collaborate on promoting Highreso's GPU cloud business
First phase due live by 2029
TSMC Expands Arizona Campus to $265B as AI Demand Surges Data Center Knowledge
The chipmaker raises capital spending outlook after cloud providers continue signaling robust demand for AI infrastructure.
3M and Microsoft Strike Partnership on Data Center Infrastructure | Business | Jul 2026 Photonics Spectra
CHELSIO LAUNCHES AI INTERCONNECT PLATFORM WITH 400Gb RDMA FOR NEXT-GENERATION DATA CENTER, STORAGE, AND AI INFRASTRUCTURE PR Newswire
Crusoe and Lancium plan to build a new AI data center in Childress, Texas W.Media
Data center insights: the forces shaping the AI infrastructure boom A&O Shearman
Inside the Race to Tame AI’s Wild Power Swings IEEE Spectrum
Data Center Security Market to Reach US$65.26 Billion by 2034 as AI-Driven Cybersecurity and Zero-Trust Adoption Accelerate Yahoo Finance Singapore
Meta Announces First AI Data Center, Prometheus, Coming Online in 2026 With More Superclusters Planned gHacks
Project in Bharat Future City commences
Japan Government, Industrial Leaders and NVIDIA Launch the World’s First National AI Infrastructure NVIDIA Newsroom
Incoming UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham appears to favor homegrown AI, but planning disputes and data center moratoriums could cause early friction.
TSMC highlights AI as key driver of data center CPU demand Crypto Briefing
Florida community revolts over AI data center planned near elementary school The Independent
Michael Burry Mocks Data Center 'Fantasy’ In ORCL, NVDA, AMZN — But Trump Sees ‘Big, Strong, Bold’ Money Machines Yahoo Finance
Trump Slams New York Data Center Moratorium as 'Terrible Decision' While Bill Ackman Points to AI Race Wi Benzinga
'Not compatible': Palm Beach County rejects controversial Project Tango AI data center WLRN
Palm Beach County commissioners reject Project Tango AI data center after nearly 12 hours of debate WPTV
Relief sweeps through community after Palm Beach County denies Project Tango AI data center WPTV
Palm Beach County commissioners vote against controversial Project Tango data center proposal WPBF
Franklin County approves 1-year AI data center moratorium mypanhandle.com
A public, no-PII feed of what the automation behind Data Center Watch is doing right now — pipeline refresh runs, curator/audit agent outcomes, new job postings, and anonymized subscriber signups. This never shows an email address.
Actual system demand — not interconnection requests. Crosshair cursors, ±1σ band, mean reference, scientific axes. Gaps stay empty — nothing is interpolated.
μ / σ / range from observed hours only · brush + scroll to zoom · EIA-930
Daily peak by balancing authority · fixed categorical colors · nulls not filled
Step series · queue jumps only at published decks · no interpolation between months
Approved vs observed · realization % = observed ÷ approved when both exist
| Region | Total queue | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ERCOT | 438.0 GW | 2026-03-31 |
Nameplate capacity by fuel — what is built, not what is requested. Complements the queue charts above.
Nightingale rose · nameplate MW share · EIA-860/860M
Lollipop fleet map · operating nameplate by region
| Region | MW | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ERCOT | 174.9 GW | 2026-04 |
| ERCOT fuel | MW | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas | 67.2 GW | 38% |
| Wind | 40.0 GW | 23% |
| Solar | 31.6 GW | 18% |
| Battery Storage | 15.9 GW | 9% |
| Coal | 13.4 GW | 8% |
| Nuclear | 5,139 MW | 3% |
| Oil/Diesel | 798 MW | 0% |
| Hydro | 549 MW | 0% |
| Other/Biomass | 374 MW | 0% |
Lower is better · reference line at industry ~1.5 PUE · source-linked table below
| Entity | $/W | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1x1 combined-cycle gas turbine plant (generation side, not the data center building) | $0.92/W | 2023 | GridLab / Energy Futures Group / Halcyon, citing EIA (Sargent & Lundy cost study) |
| Traditional prime markets, full build (shell + M&E + cooling + fit-out) | $11.00/W | 2025-2026 | CBRE Investment Management, citing Turner & Townsend Data Center Cost Index |
| Global average (shell-and-core construction) | $11.30/W | 2026 (forecast) | JLL |
| Entity | PUE | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google (global fleet-wide) | 1.09 | 2025 | Google (datacenters.google) |
| AWS (global fleet-wide) | 1.14 | 2025 | Amazon.com Inc. (Amazon Sustainability) |
| US national average (all data center types) | 1.40 | 2023 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report (LBNL-2001637) |
| Global industry average (Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2025, n=681) | 1.54 | 2025 | Uptime Institute (Uptime Intelligence) |
| Entity | Share | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States — all data centers (649 TWh reference case) | 11.8% of total U.S. electricity use | 2030 (reference forecast) | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — United States Data Center Energy Usage Report: 2025 Update |
| Ireland — all grid-connected data centers (7.663 TWh metered) | 23.0% of total metered electricity consumption | 2025 | Central Statistics Office Ireland — Data Centres Metered Electricity Consumption 2025 |
| United States — all data centers (176 TWh estimated consumption) | 4.4% of total U.S. electricity use | 2023 | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report |
| Metric | Entity | Value | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity auction clearing price | PJM RTO (2027/2028 Base Residual Auction; up from $329.17 in 2026/27) | 333.44 USD/MW-day | 2027/2028 delivery year (BRA report published 2025) | |
| Contracted large-load capacity | Ireland — data centers + other new-technology loads, transmission contracts | 2,000 MW | 2025-08 | |
| Data-center capacity | New Zealand — data-center capacity (median scenario) | 400 MW | 2035 (forecast) | |
| Data-center energy share | Ireland — data centers + new-technology loads (median scenario) | 30.0% of electrical energy requirements | 2032 (forecast) | |
| Projected data-center load growth | PJM — projected data-center load growth (up to) | 30.0 GW | 2030 (forecast) | |
| Observed data-center peak demand | Ireland — data centers (observed peak demand to date) | 800 MW | 2025-08 | |
| DC projects blocked or delayed (value) | United States (at least 75 projects blocked or delayed by local opposition) | 130.00 USD billions (approx.) | Q1 2026 (Jan-Mar) | |
| Direct liquid-cooling adoption | Data center operators globally (Uptime survey, n=512 for cooling-type question) | 22.00 percent of organizations using direct liquid cooling | 2025 survey (fielded Apr-Jun 2025) | |
| Electrical-equipment unfilled orders | United States (NAICS 335 electrical equipment, seasonally adjusted; +5.9% YoY NSA) | 54,578.00 USD millions | May 2026 (advance durable goods report) | |
| EU data-center electricity use | European Union data centres (all, EED reporting context) | 70.00 TWh/year | CY2024 (EC news item, 2025-11-17) | |
| Fleet water usage effectiveness (WUE) | Microsoft (owned datacenter fleet, global; PUE 1.17 same period) | 0.27 L/kWh | FY2025 (Jul 2024 - Jun 2025) | |
| Fleet water usage effectiveness (WUE) | Meta (owned data centers, global; five-year series 0.30 down to 0.19) | 0.19 L/kWh | CY2024 | |
| Gas-turbine backlog + slot reservations | GE Vernova (gas power equipment backlog + slot reservations; guiding to 110+ GW by end-2026) | 100.00 GW | 2026-03-31 (Q1 2026, reported 2026-04-22) | |
| Global DC electricity — 2030 projection | Global data centres (IEA base case; ~415 TWh in 2024, US 45% share) | 945.00 TWh/year projected by 2030 | 2025-04-10 (IEA Energy and AI report) | |
| Global semiconductor sales | Worldwide semiconductor sales (WSTS 3-month moving average; +104.1% YoY, Americas +132.2%) | 120.60 USD billions per month | May 2026 (SIA release, 2026-07-06) | |
| US interconnection queues — active capacity | United States (all 7 ISOs/RTOs + ~50 non-ISO utilities, active queue) | 2,060.00 GW | 2025-12-31 (Queued Up 2026 edition, published June 2026) | |
| Micron quarterly revenue (DRAM/HBM proxy) | Micron Technology (vs $9.30B a year earlier; FQ4 guidance ~$50B) | 41.46 USD billions per quarter | Fiscal Q3 2026 (quarter ended 2026-05-28) | |
| North-America top-4 markets net absorption | North America top-4 data center markets (CBRE; +34% YoY, Northern Virginia vacancy 0.3%) | 2,236.20 MW net absorption per quarter | Q1 2026 (Global Data Center Trends 2026, published 2026-06-17) | |
| Nuclear PPA capacity contracted to DCs | Talen Energy-Amazon (Susquehanna nuclear plant, expanded PPA through 2042) | 1,920 MW | 2025-06-11 (8-K press release) | |
| Power-transformer supply deficit | United States power transformer market (distribution transformers 10%; imports cover 80% of supply) | 30.00 percent of 2025 demand unmet | 2025 (Wood Mackenzie release, 2025-08-14) | |
| PPI — power/distribution transformer mfg | United States (NAICS 335311 transformer manufacturing, BLS series PCU335311335311) | 457.06 index points, NSA (preliminary) | May 2026 | |
| US private DC construction spend (SAAR) | United States (private data center construction, Census VIP; +23% vs May 2025) | 59,307.00 USD million, seasonally adjusted annual rate | May 2026 (preliminary, released 2026-07-01) | |
| DC-REIT quarterly bookings (annualized rent) | Digital Realty Trust (100% share; backlog $1.8B, occupancy 90.1%) | 707.00 USD millions annualized GAAP base rent signed per quarter | Q1 2026 (supplement filed 2026-04-23) | |
| Quarterly capex (incl. finance leases) | Meta (capex incl. finance-lease principal, global; FY2026 guidance raised to $125-145B) | 19.84 USD billions per quarter | Q1 2026 (quarter ended 2026-03-31, reported 2026-04-29) | |
| Quarterly capex (PP&E) | Alphabet (purchases of property and equipment, global; TTM $109.9B) | 35.70 USD billions per quarter | Q1 2026 (quarter ended 2026-03-31, reported 2026-04-29) | |
| Quarterly capex (PP&E) | Amazon (purchases of property and equipment, global; TTM $151.0B) | 44.20 USD billions per quarter | Q1 2026 (quarter ended 2026-03-31, reported 2026-04-29) | |
| Quarterly capex (PP&E) | Microsoft (additions to property and equipment, global; commercial RPO $627B) | 30.90 USD billions per quarter | FY26 Q3 (quarter ended 2026-03-31, reported 2026-04-29) | |
| TSMC monthly revenue (AI-demand proxy) | TSMC (company-wide, unaudited; +30.1% YoY) | 416,975.00 NT$ millions per month | May 2026 | |
| US data-center electricity use | United States data centers (4.4% of US electricity; projected 325-580 TWh by 2028) | 176.00 TWh/year | CY2023 (LBNL report published Dec 2024) | |
| Virginia DC air permits issued | Virginia (statewide, all data centers; backup-generator air permit registry rows) | 198.00 issued air permits | 2026-07-06 |
Translate a compute-power target into a first-pass equipment envelope using primary manufacturer specifications. Reported facts and derived arithmetic are labelled separately; unknowns stay unknown.
Screening formulae · units = ceil(target MW × 1,000 ÷ unit kW) · facility MW = target × PUE · utility MVA = facility MW ÷ PF · loop gpm = target MW × 3,412,142 ÷ (500 × ΔT). N+1 is a user-selected 1.25× allowance, not an engineered topology. Water consumption is never inferred from loop flow.
The calculator starts the brief; these six packages keep scope gaps from becoming change orders.
Live buying-intent feeds · SAM.gov opportunities ↗ · EU TED search API ↗ · the source atlas adds certified model universes for servers, network, storage and UPS.
Cooling · Direct liquid cooling at the rack/compute-tray level
Memory / DIMMs · Grace uses soldered LPDDR5; 1 TB aggregate CPU main memory per compute tray, not field-replaceable DIMMs.
Network · Derived rack total: 72 x ConnectX-8 HCAs and 18 x BlueField-3 DPUs from the per-tray specification.
142 kW is a published maximum for the full rack, not a measured workload average. Memory uses decimal GB. Storage count excludes management nodes and external storage. Installed PSU nameplate capacity must not be treated as rack draw.
NVIDIA Enterprise Reference Architecture: GB300 NVL72 Components ↗Cooling · Direct liquid cooling
Memory / DIMMs · 1 TB aggregate LPDDR5 CPU main memory across two Grace CPUs; no replaceable DIMM population is specified.
Network · 4 x ConnectX-8 HCAs and 1 x BlueField-3 DPU per compute tray.
A tray is a component of the NVL72 system rather than a standalone server bill of materials. The five-device count is 1 M.2 OS device plus 4 E1.S NVMe cache devices and does not express capacity.
NVIDIA Enterprise Reference Architecture: GB300 NVL72 Components ↗Cooling · Not prescribed; depends on the selected OEM control node
Memory / DIMMs · 8 x 64 GB DDR5 DIMMs = 512 GB.
Network · 4 x ConnectX-7 200 Gb/s adapters.
The architecture recommends 12 management/control nodes, but this profile describes one node. CPU wording follows the reference configuration; it is not an endorsement of a particular CPU vendor or SKU.
NVIDIA Enterprise Reference Architecture: GB300 NVL72 Components ↗Cooling · Platform implementation may use passive or active cooling
Memory / DIMMs · 288 GB HBM3E accelerator memory; no host DIMM requirement is defined by the accelerator page.
Network · PCIe 5.0 x16 host interface; fabric and NIC design are platform-specific.
Do not use 1.4 kW as server or rack input power. AMD also reports 8 TB/s peak memory bandwidth and 185 billion transistors; neither is a facility-load metric.
AMD Instinct MI355X accelerator specifications ↗Cooling · OEM/platform-specific; both passive and active accelerator implementations are supported
Memory / DIMMs · 2,304 GB aggregate HBM3E is derived; host CPU memory and DIMM population are unspecified.
Network · Host, scale-up fabric, NIC, DPU, and switch requirements are not included.
This is transparent screening arithmetic, not an AMD server BOM. It omits CPUs, DIMMs, storage, networking, cooling auxiliaries, PSUs, conversion losses, and redundancy; it cannot be compared directly with the complete 142 kW NVL72 rack rating.
AMD Instinct MI355X accelerator specifications ↗A denser layer than MW alone: power-train stages, cooling topology bands, rack-density eras, official buyer/producer indexes, equipment lead-time stress tests, and RFP blind spots. Screening orientation only — manufacturer BOMs and site engineering still win procurement.
Transmission/distribution interconnection, customer substation, utility transformers, metering, protection, curtailment terms
ISO/RTO queues · utility large-load tariffs · EIA-930 system context
MV switchgear, feeders, bus duct, main-tie-main, on-site transformers to LV
DOE distribution-transformer rules · ENERGY STAR UPS adjacency · AHRI cooling power draw
UPS topology, battery/flywheel autonomy, STS, PDU/RPP, busway to rack
ENERGY STAR UPS directory
Busway, busbar, power shelves, PSU conversion, HVDC experiments (OCP)
NVIDIA/AMD primary BOMs · OCP rack specs
Diesel/HVO/gas gensets, fuel storage, paralleling, BESS, black start, emissions controls
EPA engine certification data · state air permits
Rack band · ≤ ~15–20 kW/rack typical; practical ceiling often cited ~30–40 kW with rear-door assist
PUE band · ~1.3–1.6 (design- and climate-dependent)
Water · Often cooling-tower or dry-cooler dependent; WUE is site-specific
Use when · Legacy enterprise, moderate-density colo, inference pods that stay air-coolable
Industry practice band for screening; validate with ASHRAE thermal guidelines and OEM envelopes
Rack band · ~20–40 kW/rack common screening band
PUE band · ~1.2–1.4 when free cooling is available
Water · Facility water loop; can reduce air-handler count
Use when · Mid-density GPU refresh inside existing shells
Industry practice band; pair with AHRI datacom ratings for equipment shortlists
Rack band · ~40–150 kW/rack; AI training racks often designed 100–140+ kW
PUE band · ~1.03–1.15 when liquid fraction is high
Water · Secondary loop flow is not water consumption; WUE still needs a water balance
Use when · GB200/GB300-class racks and dense OAM platforms
Aligned with public AI-rack power disclosures (e.g. NVL72 up to 142 kW) plus industry DLC practice
Rack band · ~100–200+ kW/rack screening band
PUE band · ~1.02–1.08 claimed in vendor case literature — treat as aspirational until measured
Water · Dielectric fluid inventory, leak detection, and heat-rejection water still apply
Use when · Extreme density experiments, specialized HPC, or shells designed around tanks
Secondary/vendor literature heavy — require FAT/SAT and third-party thermal tests in RFPs
| Era | Rack power | Note | Evidence class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-AI enterprise (illustrative) | 4–12 kW | Historical average enterprise densities often cited near mid-single to low-double-digit kW/rack. | secondary_industry |
| Modern air-cooled GPU pods | 20–40 kW | Many retrofit halls target this band before full liquid conversion. | secondary_industry |
| NVIDIA GB200/GB300 NVL72-class AI rack | up to 142 kW (GB300 NVL72 manufacturer maximum) | NVIDIA's GB300 NVL72 Enterprise Reference Architecture states up to 142 kW for the full liquid-cooled rack — a manufacturer maximum, not a workload average. | primary_manufacturer |
| Next-wave liquid AI cabinets (roadmap / secondary) | 200–600+ kW discussed in industry and vendor roadmaps | Treat roadmap kW figures as scenario inputs, not purchaseable nameplate, until an OEM publishes a BOM. | secondary_roadmap |
Metric · Seasonally adjusted annual-rate $ put in place
May 2026 preliminary · ~$59.3B SAAR (secondary rebroadcast of Census private construction detail)
Cleanest official monthly dollar flow into U.S. data-center construction — a buyer CapEx index.
Open series ↗Metric · Open notices for servers, UPS, generators, cooling, construction, ops
Continuous — filter by NAICS/PSC/CPV + place of performance
Buying intent before awards — the language of scopes, options, and delivery dates.
Open series ↗Metric · Index level, MoM and YoY %
Track via BLS/FRED; May 2026 prints near ~457 (index, not $)
Producer price pressure on the longest-lead electrical equipment.
Open series ↗Metric · Index level for multiuser host computers
Monthly BLS/FRED series
Hardware inflation/deflation input for server BOMs and lease pricing models.
Open series ↗Metric · Industry PPI for hosting / IT infrastructure provisioning
Monthly BLS industry product series
Service-side price index for colo/cloud-like outputs.
Open series ↗Metric · Listed-company monthly revenue
High-frequency producer throughput for AI servers and silicon
Producer supply heartbeat before annual reports — boards, power, cooling, and chips.
Open series ↗Metric · Value and quantity by HTS for transformers, generators, chillers, servers, optics
Monthly merchandise trade
Physical supply flows and tariff exposure for the equipment bill of materials.
Open series ↗Metric · TWh/year scenarios
Base case ~945 TWh by 2030 (~3% of world electricity)
Global demand ceiling used by policymakers and utilities; not a project queue.
Open series ↗Secondary survey and industry bands for schedule risk — not purchase-order commitments. Confirm with current OEM quotes.
| Equipment | Band | Evidence | Note | Planning use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large power transformers | ~100–144+ weeks commonly reported; some GSU quotes longer | secondary_survey | Wood Mackenzie Q2 2025 survey figures widely reported: ~128 weeks power transformers, ~144 weeks GSUs. Use as a schedule stress test, not a purchase order. | Order at concept / before final design freeze; dual-source and accept-alternates language in RFP |
| MV switchgear | ~44–80 weeks reported depending on class and customization | secondary_survey | Trade-press summaries of 2025–2026 utility surveys; confirm with current OEM quotes. | Freeze one-line early; hold production slots |
| Diesel / large standby generators | ~50–78 weeks for many 1.5–3 MW-class blocks (indicative) | secondary_industry | Highly configuration-dependent; emissions aftertreatment and paralleling gear add time. | Air-permit family and fuel strategy lock with procurement |
| AI accelerator supply (GPU/OAM) | Allocation-driven; not a single public lead-time series | secondary_market | Track producer revenue (TWSE), foundry revenue, and OEM allocation letters rather than a BLS lead-time series. | BOM revision control + dual architecture options in RFP |
| Liquid-cooling CDUs / facility water skids | Project-specific; often on critical path once rack density exceeds air limits | secondary_industry | Pair AHRI datacom certifications with factory-witness tests; no single public national lead-time index. | Specify ΔT, approach, water quality, and controls interoperability explicitly |
What teams miss when they only scope MW and rack count.
Interconnecting TSPs must submit the Batch Zero LIF workbook, Dynamic Stability Study Form, and Section 9.2.1.2/9.2.1.4 attestations to BatchZero@ercot.com source
ILLEs must submit Form X (WLPUN designation), Form W (PCLR commitment), and Section 9.2.1.1 attestations to their interconnecting DSP/TSP source
PUCT approved rules for ERCOT to review an initial batch of large-load interconnection requests (75+ MW), including a $50,000/MW fee structure source
ERCOT tracking 438 GW of large-load requests; ~90% from data centers; 198 GW applied in Q1 2026 alone source
ERCOT reported receiving 137 new LLI submissions totaling approximately 140,000 MW of new large load by 2036, still being processed source
226 GW of large-load interconnection requests, up from 63 GW twelve months earlier; 73% from data centers source
| Month | Total queue | Approved | Observed peak | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 438.0 GW | 9,042 MW | 3,883 MW | Utility Dive / PUCT; ERCOT Mar 2026 TAC report |
| 2025-11-30 | 226.0 GW | — | — | ERCOT public data via davefriedman.substack.com |
| 2025-03-31 | — | 9,042 MW | 3,883 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Mar 2026 (TAC) |
| 2024-11-30 | 63.0 GW | — | — | ERCOT public data via davefriedman.substack.com |
| 2024-01-31 | 39.3 GW | 4,479 MW | 2,587 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-12-31 | 39.2 GW | 4,479 MW | 2,432 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-10-31 | 39.3 GW | 3,926 MW | 2,379 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-09-30 | 39.6 GW | 3,926 MW | 2,379 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-08-31 | 42.5 GW | 3,744 MW | 2,347 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-07-31 | — | 3,084 MW | 2,336 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-05-31 | 41.8 GW | 2,620 MW | 2,072 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-04-30 | 39.6 GW | 2,570 MW | 2,013 MW | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2023-03-31 | 39.4 GW | 2,570 MW | — | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
| 2022-04-30 | 17.4 GW | — | — | ERCOT LLI Status Update Jan 2024 |
Dual axis · log efficiency (Gflops/W) + HPL power (MW) · measured as published, never estimated
| List | System | Country | HPL Rmax | Power | Gflops/W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11 | El Capitan | United States | 1,742.0 PF | 29.6 MW | 58.89 |
| 2024-06 | Aurora | United States | 1,012.0 PF | 38.7 MW | 26.15 |
| 2022-06 | Frontier | United States | 1,102.0 PF | 21.1 MW | 52.23 |
| 2020-11 | Fugaku | Japan | 442.0 PF | 29.9 MW | 14.78 |
| 2019-06 | Summit | United States | 148.6 PF | 10.1 MW | 14.72 |
| 2016-06 | Sunway TaihuLight | China | 93.0 PF | 15.4 MW | 6.05 |
| 2013-06 | Tianhe-2 | China | 33.9 PF | 17.8 MW | 1.90 |
| 2012-11 | Titan | United States | 17.6 PF | 8.2 MW | 2.14 |
| 2011-11 | K computer | Japan | 10.5 PF | 12.7 MW | 0.83 |
| 2009-11 | Jaguar | United States | 1.8 PF | 7.0 MW | 0.25 |
| 2008-06 | Roadrunner | United States | 1.0 PF | 2.3 MW | 0.44 |
Documented data centers, computing payloads, and proposals in non-standard environments — including Antarctic research IT (McMurdo IT&C, IceCube, South Pole Telescope). Communications platforms and edge systems are labelled when they are not full data centers; no unpublished MW is inferred. Commercial hyperscale does not operate on the Antarctic continent under the Treaty System.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Commercial cloud device operationalized aboard the ISS in 2022; commercial AI inference conducted in orbit. Edge device, not a full data center.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Data Center Unit-1 powered by Red Hat Device Edge; cloud computing, AI/ML, data fusion, and space-cybersecurity test applications.
Axiom Space · Free-flying low Earth orbit nodes
First two dedicated orbital data-center nodes launched January 11, 2026; 2.5 Gbps-capable optical intersatellite links.
NASA + Hewlett Packard Enterprise · International Space Station
HPE ProLiant DL360 server plus Edgeline 4000 server; research and commercial edge-compute validation.
Starcloud · Low Earth orbit
First NVIDIA H100 GPU in orbit; company reports Gemini inference and nanoGPT training in space.
Axiom Space · International Space Station
Planned additional ISS ODC node; Axiom says it plans at least three interconnected ODC nodes by 2027.
Starcloud · Sun-synchronous orbit
GPU cluster; persistent storage; 24/7 access; proprietary thermal and power systems in a smallsat form factor.
European Space Agency · ESA Discovery and Preparation study
Generic space-data-centre architecture and simulation; the work examines technical operational and economic constraints before mission approval.
Lonestar Data Holdings · Odysseus landing site near the lunar south pole
Commercial lunar data-storage and edge-processing test; data was stored on the Moon and returned to Earth.
Highlander / HiCloud · Lingshui Li, Hainan, China
Builder-backed project reported as running smoothly after its first module launched March 31, 2023; commercial undersea data-center service and deployment program.
Microsoft · European Marine Energy Centre, North Sea
240 kW; 12 racks; 864 servers; 27.6 PB; deployed June 2018 and retrieved July 2020.
Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries + 12-org consortium (KIOST, UNIST, POSCO, GS E&C, SK Telecom) · Offshore Ulsan, South Korea
Site selected April 2026; test module at 20 m depth (as reported); target PUE 1.2; 51.1 billion won total investment through 2030; demonstration facility targeted by 2030, commercial construction from 2031. Nothing deployed yet.
Highlander / CCCC · China coastal regions
Strategic partnership signed June 2026 for scaled undersea compute deployment and computing-power / offshore-energy synergy.
Subsea Cloud · Subsea deployment portfolio
Modular subsea data centers on a build/deploy/maintain model; company marketing claims up to 700 MW per-site capability (a capability claim, not deployed capacity); Project OTTO rolling customer trial began October 2024 off south-west Norway with a 16-rack unit at 150 kW+ per rack.
Microsoft · Pacific Ocean seabed
First underwater data-center pilot operated approximately one kilometer off the Pacific coast from August to November 2015.
NetworkOcean · San Francisco Bay, California, USA
Company claimed a 500 kW capsule and offered 2,048 NVIDIA H100 GPUs for reservation; sought no permits and SF Bay regulators warned of heavy fines (Wired, Sept 2024). No public evidence the test ever took place; current status unknown.
Denv-R / Geps Techno · Quai Wilson, Loire River, Nantes, France
200 kW in a 100 m2 solar-covered container housing four racks; passive Loire river-water cooling without pumps; operational since October 2024. A swell-powered offshore version is planned, not built.
Nautilus Data Technologies · Stockton, California, USA
6.5 MW critical IT load across four data halls; Tier III; ~55 kW rack densities via river-water cooling; commissioned 2021. Listed for sale at $45m in November 2024 at 86% leased as the operator pivots to licensing its EcoCore cooling technology.
Aker BP / Armada · Norwegian Continental Shelf, Norway
Agreement announced March 2026; begins with a single containerized Galleon unit for on-rig processing of drilling and operational data. Edge compute on a working platform, not a colocation data center; no capacity figures published.
Keppel Data Centres · 25 Loyang Crescent, Singapore
25 MW project with a four-story 19.2 MW waterborne module; seawater-cooled; capacity committed to an unnamed global hyperscaler; funded by Keppel Data Centre Fund II. Construction began Q1 2026; go-live targeted 2028.
Samsung Heavy Industries · No site announced
Concept/pre-order stage targeting commercialization as soon as Q2 2028; dedicated barge with on-board electrical infrastructure, initially shore-grid powered with water cooling. No vessel built, no committed capacity.
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines / Hitachi / Hitachi Systems · Japan (Malaysia and US under consideration)
MOU signed March 30, 2026 for demand verification and feasibility studies; operations targeted 2027 or later. Illustrative example: a car carrier offers ~54,000 m2 floor area; ~1-year conversion vs several years for a land build. No vessel converted yet.
Arctic World Archive (Piql / SNSK) · Mine no. 3, Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway
Offline, air-gapped piqlFilm vault 300 m inside the mine at about -4C; launched March 2017; hosts the GitHub Arctic Code Vault. Archival storage with manual retrieval, not an online data center - zero compute, off-grid by design.
Bluebird Network · Springfield, Missouri, USA
6 MW built-out capacity (per Data Center Map listing); 85 feet underground encased in solid limestone; three diverse utility feeds, three backup generators, SOC 2 Type II; colocation plus fiber transport and Internet services.
Tencent · Gui'an New Area, Guizhou, China
Capacity for 300,000 servers with about one-sixth housed in five tunnel caves; more than 30,000 m2 of tunneled space on a ~470,000 m2 site; maximum PUE ~1.1 logged in a Ministry of Industry and Information Technology inspection.
GPI · Val di Non, Italy
European data center built inside an active mine approximately 100 meters below the surface; officially online in June 2026.
Lefdal Mine Data Centers · Måløy, Norway
Six underground levels and 75 chambers; up to 120,000 m2 potential white space; Level 3 capacity is 80 MW.
Bahnhof · Stockholm, Sweden
Operating data center built inside a Cold War civil-defense / nuclear fallout shelter beneath Vita Bergen.
Green Mountain · Stavanger, Norway
Former high-security NATO ammunition storage converted to a Tier III mountain-hall data center; 25 MW site capacity and 22,600 m2 space.
MOUNT10 · Swiss Alps, Switzerland
Underground data-storage and data-center site in former Swiss military bunkers.
Iron Mountain · Butler County, Pennsylvania
220 feet underground; 15.5 MW power capacity; 330,000 square feet; geothermal cooling from an underground reservoir.
Westland Bunker · Montgomery County, Texas, USA
Built 1982 as Westland Oil headquarters with a 40,000 sq ft nuclear bomb shelter; expanded with a 107,000 sq ft data center; 23 MW power capacity (per Baxtel); zero-downtime performance through Hurricane Ike.
Deltalis · Near Attinghausen, Swiss Alps, Switzerland
Up to 10,000 m2 planned colocation space in a Cold War command-and-control bunker; Deltalis exited retail colocation in 2018 and the site was reportedly repositioned toward cryptocurrency mining/storage.
SoftBank / HAPSMobile · Stratosphere at approximately 19 km
62,500-foot / 19-km test flight; first LTE connectivity from a fixed-wing HAPS. Communications platform, not a data center.
AALTO / Airbus · Stratosphere above 60,000 feet
Solar-electric stratospheric aircraft with observation and connectivity payloads. Airborne platform, not a data center.
SoftBank / Sceye · Stratosphere at approximately 20 km
Long-duration helium HAPS; pre-commercial service scheduled in Japan for 2026. Communications platform, not a data center.
Academic proposal · High-altitude platform
Research proposal for a flying data-center-enabled HAP; no commercial deployment identified.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (A. A. Periola) · Conceptual; modeled at 16-30 km altitude
Peer-reviewed MATLAB simulation of stratosphere-based data centres: modeled 43.9% average PUE improvement from an intelligent server-awakening architecture. No hardware built, flown, or deployed.
Project queues, product certification, server/UPS/storage/network BOMs, water and emissions, tenders, trade, construction, supplier revenue, climate, and physical risk. Each card states its signal, cadence, access path, and authority so a forecast is never mistaken for a transaction or a certified model.
Statewide registry of every air permit issued to a data center in Virginia (backup diesel-generator permits): site name, registration number, issuance date, program type and county, with 198 rows as of July 6, 2026. Bot-blocked; scraping requires a browser-like session.
Research proposal for a flying data-center-enabled high-altitude platform, including energy, solar, thermal, communication, and offloading analysis. It is a study, not a deployment record.
Primary platform source for the solar-electric Zephyr HAPS operating above 60,000 feet with earth-observation and connectivity payloads. It is tracked as an airborne compute-adjacent platform, not a data center.
Primary HAPS source covering Sunglider testing at 19 km, Sceye long-duration platform, solar power, payloads, and planned pre-commercial communications service. HAPS is tracked as atmospheric edge infrastructure, not a full data center.
Lets backup-generator RFPs connect engine families to certified emissions characteristics before air-permit screening.
Closest official price index for the service side of the data-center product — a buyer/seller contract benchmark, not a facility MW measure.
Practical API layer for stitching construction-spend (buyer), transformer PPI (producer), and server PPI into one monitoring graph.
National capacity map for large users: available transport capacity, congestion, queue counts, and requested MW by supply area. It is a constraint and connection-readiness source, not a data-center project list.
Official PJM capacity-market auction library with results, supply curves and planning parameters for every delivery year back to 2007/08. The 2027/2028 BRA cleared at $333.44/MW-day RTO-wide (up from $329.17), with total cleared-capacity cost of $16.4B.
Free JSON APIs over every SEC filing: the XBRL company-concept endpoint returns full quarterly time series of tagged line items such as purchases of property and equipment for Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and the data-center REITs. Filings appear within minutes of release; a descriptive User-Agent header is required.
Paid-tracker firm publishing headline numbers free in its article stream: hyperscale operator capex of $142B in Q3 2025, 1,297 hyperscale data centers worldwide with 770 in pipeline, and US share of hyperscale capacity at 55%.
Supports free-cooling hours, design-day temperature, evaporative-water stress, flood/precipitation, and long-run climate-normal comparisons.
Enables transparent GPU-only load and memory arithmetic while exposing what a full platform RFP still must specify.
Turns CPU, memory, PSU, and measured efficiency claims into a comparable machine-readable buying universe.
Provides a defensible bridge from AI capacity targets to rack count, memory, network ports, liquid cooling, and electrical scope.
Bridges component BOMs to facility busway, busbar, and HVDC design language used in hyperscale RFPs.
Maps signed connection projects and high-/low-voltage sites with contracted capacity. It can inform location and queue diligence for large loads, but it does not publish a data-center-specific queue and access requires registration.
Official monthly survey of US construction spending with a dedicated private 'Data center' line, published as machine-readable XLSX (seasonally adjusted annual rate plus unadjusted history). May 2026 preliminary shows $59.3B SAAR, exceeding all general office construction.
Provides the clearest official monthly buyer-side index of dollars flowing into U.S. data-centre construction.
Moves cooling RFPs from marketing claims toward comparable, third-party-certified thermal performance.
Annual survey (1,033 respondents in 2025) of data-center cooling technology mix, including direct liquid cooling adoption at 22% of organizations, DLC drivers and barriers, and the rack-density threshold at which operators expect air cooling to fail.
Daily model-based estimate of Bitcoin network electricity consumption with a free CSV download API (134.19 TWh annualised best guess as of 2026-07-11) and a companion mining map with country and US-state hashrate shares. CC BY-NC-SA licensed.
Official data-center connection policy, application form, technical assessment, constrained-area criteria, demand fees, maximum-import-capacity process, and energisation prerequisites. Individual applications are not published as a public queue.
IEA's dedicated study of data-centre and AI electricity demand: ~415 TWh consumed globally in 2024 (~1.5% of world electricity), projected to ~945 TWh by 2030, with US at 45% of 2024 consumption and China at 25%. Underlying dataset downloadable from the report page.
ERCOT's paid emergency curtailment program in which qualified loads commit MW deliverable in 10 or 30 minutes, procured four times per year; awarded MW and cost by service type are posted per contract term via the NP3-144-M data product.
Mandatory EU-wide reporting scheme requiring every data centre with >=500 kW IT demand to report PUE, WUE, energy-reuse and renewable factors to a European database each May, with an aggregated public dashboard and periodic assessment report. Commission reporting puts EU data-centre electricity use at 70 TWh in 2024.
DOE-commissioned bottom-up model of US data-center electricity use: 176 TWh in 2023 (4.4% of US electricity), projected to 325-580 TWh (6.7-12%) by 2028, with server/storage/network/cooling component breakdowns. Companion free benchmarking tools (DC Pro, PUE estimators) hosted on the same site.
Adds a carbon and industrial-neighbor layer for siting diligence beyond eGRID subregion averages.
Creates a repeatable environmental diligence layer around candidate campuses, generators, cooling discharge, and nearby industrial burden.
Leading development signal that appears before many commercial inventory databases — one permit is not one campus.
Free press releases carrying hard numbers from paid quarterly trackers: data center physical infrastructure (power/cooling) revenue ~$12B in 1Q 2026 (+28% YoY, thermal management +~50%), and data center semiconductor/component revenue +116% YoY.
A procurement-grade cross-check for whether specified power and mechanical equipment has filed required federal certifications.
Continuously maintained ArcGIS web map of existing, under-construction and proposed data centers across Virginia, compiled from county land-use filings, with a companion diesel-generator air-quality map. A regional nonprofit tracker, but widely cited as the de-facto state dataset.
Creates a mandatory, comparable facility-performance layer spanning electricity, water, efficiency, and waste-heat indicators.
Rare national primary meter: 23% of Ireland metered electricity in 2025 — a buyer-side system-impact index, not a developer claim.
Primary U.S. energy baseline: 176 TWh (2023) and 325–580 TWh (2028 range) — the denominator for national share claims.
Monthly Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories and Orders survey with downloadable XLSX tables breaking out NAICS 335 electrical equipment: May 2026 advance shows new orders of $18.4B and unfilled orders of $54.6B (+5.9% YoY NSA).
System-planner data-center capacity scenarios and connection diligence. The companion connection-reporting process records proponent, site, coordinates, capacity, projected demand, commissioning date, and project stage; detailed portal access is controlled.
Primary demand-and-supply planning and firm-generation procurement signal. EMA identifies data centers and semiconductors as high-demand drivers; it does not identify individual data-center projects.
Current long-term forecast report, tables, data workbook, data-center accuracy report, and load-adjustment evidence. PJM vets large-load requests for commitments and double-counting; this is a forecast and validation source rather than a public queue.
Official system-planning entry point for data-center demand integration, connection processes, forecast development, and the 2026 ISP modelling/data workbooks. It is a planning source, not a public project queue.
Supports location-based carbon, marginal procurement context, and grid-resource-mix comparisons without relying on vendor sustainability claims.
Authoritative global demand envelope (base case ~945 TWh by 2030, just under 3% of world electricity) used to size national/grid conversations without confusing MW requests for metered load.
Adds hourly and forecast load context for testing whether data-center requests are large relative to the system that must serve them.
Provides the denominator and utility-level context needed to compare proposed hyperscale load with existing customers, sales, and programs.
Places data-center servers inside the official long-run electricity outlook rather than as an orphan side estimate.
Offers a rare operator-published leading indicator: projects in application, approval, and implementation before they appear in metered demand.
Operator planning forecast (e.g. up to ~30 GW by 2030) for the densest U.S. interconnection market outside ERCOT deep-dive coverage.
Time-coincident load, wind, and solar generation profiles. ERCOT actuals cover 2017-2018; NYISO/MISO/SPP actuals cover 2018-2019. Includes deterministic and probabilistic forecasts for existing sites and projected capacity-growth scenarios derived from interconnection-queue proposals.
The canonical US-wide interconnection-queue dataset covering all 7 ISOs/RTOs plus ~50 non-ISO utilities (~98% of US generating capacity), with project-level Excel data on capacity by fuel, status, region, queue duration and completion rates. The 2026 edition covers ~8,200 active projects with data through end-2025.
Operator requirements and planning context for non-conforming large loads, including data centers and advanced manufacturing. Useful for operational-readiness signals; it is not a public, project-level queue.
Monthly dashboard of high-voltage connection requests to the Italian grid that explicitly breaks out data centers as a consumer-load category, with request counts, GW and authorisation status navigable to regional/provincial level. Bulk files available via the portal's Download Center.
Public interconnection queue spreadsheet whose scope explicitly includes new and materially modified load facilities alongside generation and transmission, with queue position, MW, zone, status and dates per project.
Transmission-system connection data published from Statnett’s connection database: reserved capacity and mature queue projects by company, industry category, MW volume, location, and planned completion. Category filtering can surface data-center / industrial demand where disclosed.
Project-scale large-load request workflow, study and fee milestones, energisation path, status materials, and committee records. This is the current deepest public data-center / large-load queue in the registry.
Primary system-operator paper with operating data-center peak demand, contracted capacity, demand share, connection applications, technical constraints, and 2032 adequacy scenarios. Some figures combine data centers with other new-technology loads and are labelled that way in Grid Watch.
Free brokerage research with market-by-market vacancy, net absorption MW, under-construction MW and asking-rate trends; the 2026 edition reports North America top-4 net absorption of 2,236 MW in Q1 2026 and Northern Virginia vacancy of 0.3%.
Quarterly earnings 8-Ks on EDGAR with detailed HBM product and supply disclosures; FQ3-2026 revenue was $41.46B vs $9.30B a year earlier, with HBM4 in high-volume shipment and FQ4 guidance of ~$50B. EDGAR is the bot-friendly path (Micron's IR site times out).
Daily DRAM and NAND flash spot prices by part (DDR5/DDR4 by density, NAND) plus the DXI market index, updated intraday; DDR5 16Gb averaged $47.80 on July 10, 2026.
Adds the often-missed network portion of IT load and makes RFP shortlists auditable at model level.
The industry-standard submarine cable map exposes free unauthenticated GeoJSON endpoints for cable routes and landing points (695 cable systems and 1,917 landing points verified on 2026-07-12), with per-cable owner, length and ready-for-service metadata.
Primary press releases for the flagship operating-fleet nuclear PPAs with data-center buyers: Microsoft-Crane Clean Energy Center (~835 MW Three Mile Island restart, 20-year) and Meta-Clinton (1,121 MW, 20-year from June 2027), with MW and duration on-page.
Vendor and deployment source for underwater intelligent computing cabins, private cloud, undersea data centers, deployment projects, and the 2026 marine computing-power / offshore-energy partnership.
Primary mission record for the two underwater prototypes: deployment, retrieval, power, rack/server payload, storage, reliability, water use, and the current research-stage status.
Commercial subsea data-center platform describing modular build, deployment, maintenance, cooling, connectivity, and public performance claims. No public MW or operating customer count is assumed.
Quarterly disclosure of orders (record €17.7B in Q2 FY2026), order backlog (€154B) and book-to-bill (1.72) by segment; Grid Technologies covers HVDC, switchgear and grid-connection equipment with US-driven growth.
Quarterly disclosure of total orders ($18.3B in Q1 2026), total backlog ($163B) and, uniquely, gas power equipment backlog plus slot-reservation agreements in GW (83 to 100 GW during Q1 2026, guiding to 110+ GW by end-2026).
Generator-level inventory: nameplate capacity, fuel type, owner/utility, in-service and planned/actual retirement dates, prime mover, technology, and environmental equipment. Texas/ERCOT plants are a filterable state subset, not a separate file.
Quarterly tracker of US data-center projects blocked or delayed by local opposition, moratorium proposals and state legislation; Q1 2026 counted at least 75 projects worth ~$130B blocked or delayed, with 300+ state bills filed in six weeks. Note the name collision with datacentr.net's own branding — attribute carefully.
Primary orbital data-center program record covering AxDCU-1, the first two free-flying ODC nodes launched January 11, 2026, optical links, the ISS node roadmap, and long-term kilowatt-to-megawatt expansion intent.
Adds a consistent multi-hazard screen for flood, hurricane, wildfire, heat, winter weather, earthquake, and other correlated siting risks.
Supports primary/secondary/tertiary power-chain scoping with comparable UPS ratings and part-load efficiency.
Anchors transformer efficiency, compliance, and replacement assumptions while supplier lead-time signals are assessed elsewhere.
Quarterly P25 solar/wind PPA offer-price index built from marketplace offers across AESO, CAISO, ERCOT, MISO, PJM and SPP; public posts carry directional QoQ/YoY changes each quarter (Q1 2026: P25 solar +4.6% QoQ, wind +8% QoQ), with absolute levels subscriber-only.
Provides an open, cross-border buyer-intent feed for data-centre construction and equipment with both pre-award and award-stage evidence.
Surfaces buying intent and RFP language for servers, accelerators, cooling, UPS, generators, substations, construction, and operations before awards.
Official monthly producer price indexes via free JSON API for transformers (PCU335311335311), switchgear/switchboards (PCU335313335313) and electrical contractors on nonresidential work (PCU23821X23821X). Transformer PPI is up ~5.5% YoY as of May 2026 and has more than doubled since pre-2020.
Primary producer-price pressure for the long-lead substation equipment that gates campus energization.
Producer-side price index for server hardware used in RFP escalation clauses and CapEx sensitivity screens.
Upstream silicon/component price pressure that eventually flows into accelerator boards and networking silicon.
A direct project and customer-identity signal that appears earlier than many commercial inventory datasets and can be reconciled to permits and grid requests.
FERC's generic proceeding on large loads co-located at generating facilities (AD24-11) plus the related company-specific dockets (Talen/AWS ISA amendment, BGE/PECO/ComEd/Pepco filings) and the EL25-49 show-cause proceeding on PJM co-location rules. Full filing history available via FERC eLibrary docket sheets.
North American reliability assessment with planner-submitted demand forecasts, large-load / data-center growth, resource-adequacy risk, and regional exposure. The source is a validated planning outlook, not an interconnection queue.
Monthly average retail electricity price by state and sector with YoY comparison (Table 5.6.A); April 2026 shows US industrial average 8.66 c/kWh, Texas 6.33, Virginia 9.86. Also queryable via the EIA v2 API for automation.
Free downloadable Excel of monthly worldwide semiconductor billings by region spanning four decades, updated monthly from the WSTS Blue Book; latest data May 2026. This is the machine-readable series behind SIA's monthly press numbers ($120.6B in May 2026, +104.1% YoY).
Statutory monthly revenue disclosure (NT$ millions, MoM/YoY, YTD) published around the 10th of each month; May 2026 revenue was up 30.1% YoY. TSMC fabricates nearly all NVIDIA/AMD accelerator dies.
Connects storage architecture and capacity procurement to measured energy characteristics rather than nameplate guesses.
Creates a high-frequency producer-side view of AI server, PCB, power, cooling, and semiconductor demand before annual financial statements.
Japan's cross-regional grid coordinator publishes English editions of the annual Aggregation of Electricity Supply Plans and seasonal supply-demand outlooks, with 10-year demand and capacity projections for the 10 service areas; data-center and chip-fab demand upgrades surface here first.
Searchable database of GASB 77 tax-abatement disclosures from state and local government financial statements, FY2015-FY2025, covering all 50 states plus major localities; a companion April 2026 report quantifies data-center-specific losses (Georgia $2.5B, Virginia $1.94B, Texas $1B per year).
Measures physical supply flow and price/value pressure for transformers, switchgear, generators, chillers, servers, semiconductors, and optical equipment.
Free press-release summaries of Wood Mackenzie's paid transformer supply and lead-time survey: 30% power-transformer and 10% distribution-transformer supply deficits in 2025, demand +116% since 2019, imports covering 80% of power-transformer supply, and average lead times around 120 weeks.
Company announcement for an operating data center approximately 100 meters below the surface inside an active mine in Val di Non.
Operating high-security data center in converted mountain halls / former NATO ammunition storage, with published site capacity, space, PUE, grid supplies, and build-out description.
Operating underground data-center campus in a former mine with published chambers, white-space potential, levels, power backbone, and 80 MW Level 3 capacity.
Operating Stockholm data center built inside a former Cold War civil-defense / nuclear fallout shelter, with published security, connectivity, cooling, and operations detail.
Operating secure underground data-storage / data-center infrastructure in former Swiss military bunkers in the Alps.
Operating colocation site 220 feet underground in a former limestone mine, with published 15.5 MW power capacity, 330,000 square feet, geothermal cooling, utility, and connectivity.
Makes watershed availability, drought response, intake/discharge context, and cooling-water risk measurable at site scale.
Cooling topology is often decided by water rights and discharge permits before a CDU model is selected.
Annual environmental report disclosing total operational water (2024: 11,011 million gallons withdrawn, 8,135 consumed, +28% YoY), 64% freshwater replenishment, and per-site water data across Google's data center cities.
Weekly national drought classification (D0-D4) with downloadable statistics by state, county and urban area, DSCI index, GIS shapefiles and web services for programmatic pulls.
Free republication of ICE-traded daily day-ahead firm power prices (weighted-average index, high/low, volume) at seven hubs including ERCOT North and PJM West, with current-year and multi-year XLSX archives.
Machine-readable appendix to Meta's annual sustainability report with 2020-2024 time series for data-center WUE (0.30 down to 0.19 L/kWh), PUE (1.10 to 1.08), water withdrawal by source in megaliters, and withdrawals from high-water-stress areas.
Official fleet efficiency page publishing PUE and WUE for Microsoft's owned datacenter fleet, globally and by Americas/EMEA/APAC, for the last two fiscal years: FY25 global WUE 0.27 L/kWh and PUE 1.17.
Critical-facilities, MEP, commissioning, and operations roles from public Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby boards — plus optional sponsored listings when Adzuna keys are configured. No Indeed or LinkedIn scraping.
Daily digest signup not configured yet — see deploy/daily-digest-setup.md.
Project-level LLI tracking, county permits, CSV/API export, docket alerts.
Open pro database Free while in beta